Codecov Report

Merging #39 (80957bd) into master (29e0fb0) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #39   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    0.00%   0.00%           
======================================
  Files          15      15           
  Lines        1335    1344    +9     
======================================
- Misses       1335    1344    +9     

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 29e0fb0...80957bd. Read the comment docs.

@scarlehoff When you can, could you check whether this (5429600) is a reasonable change. It basically gets around manually running the adiabatic minimization. The solution I found is a bit archaic & brute but it works fine xD

I'll have a look. Is there a way to hide codecov warnigns? I find it very "noisy"

I'll have a look. Is there a way to hide codecov warnigns? I find it very "noisy"

Good question! This is a part of the Github integration App for this repo which I am not able to remove.

@scarlehoff Thanks! I have this very bad habit of putting multiply definitions in one line (which I thought would prioritize visualization, but I have to get rid of that...).

It depends on the situation, in practice what a, b = c,d does is to create the tuple (c, d) and then break it into (a, b). But in this case each of c and d are lists themselves so it becomes a bit confusing (and prone to errors, because you can do a,b=[c,d] and it works as well!)

It depends on the situation, in practice what a, b = c,d does is to create the tuple (c, d) and then break it into (a, b). But in this case each of c and d are lists themselves so it becomes a bit confusing (and prone to errors, because you can do a,b=[c,d] and it works as well!)

I definitely agree!

I suppose this can be merged now.

I'm playing with it now. I have a few comments:

• Add some warning/info that adiabatic optimization is running.
• How do I avoid adiabatic optimization?